Color 'Round Linux

To content | To menu | To search

Picture Manager Comparison

Entries feed - Comments feed

Thursday, October 23 2008

A look into: Microsoft Vista's Windows Photo Gallery

Ok, a rather long name for a product, but it comes bundled with the Vista operating system. As I don't have Vista myself, a collegue provided me with the software and made a demo of the product.

If Windows Photo Gallery does provide some support for RAW pictures, it failed however to recognize / import my RAW pictures. It seems that the now defunct Minolta body is not supported. Clearly a show-stopper, at least for me.

Except this annoyance however, Windows Photo Gallery is a very descent picture manager and compare very favorably with the previous software that I have reviewed (namely Picasa, F-Spot, Digikam). With Windows Photo Gallery you will be able to tag (multiple level supported here) pictures. You will be able to filter according to multiple tags if you go through the search tool (search for tag1, tag2, etc.) Not tremendous but it does the job. One very good point is that the tags are stored within the picture following the standards and can be retrieved from an other picture manager (such as Digikam)

Windows Photo Gallery does the basic editing tricks (color, exposure, sharpness, crop, auto) that you will find everywhere. One very good point, was the ability to "undo" the changes on a saved picture within a single click. However, I don't know if the software reverse its action and re-save, or simply past the original picture that it has stored somewhere in the system before we began editing the picture. My guess is that it reverse its action and re-save and as jpeg is a destructive format, doing this too many times would probably result in loss of some details.

As a conclusion, we have yet an other tool for the "entry level market". It performs well and will fit most needs. Tagging has been well thought of and intuitiveness is there. I'm not sure how it would work for very large collection, but for someone with advanced needs, the editing section will probably be the first true gap.

Monday, October 20 2008

A look into: F-Spot

F-Spot is the default tool for managing pictures for many Linux distribution. Compared to Picasa, F-Spot supports tagging but is clearly behind when it comes to raw support (at least with raws from my Minolta D7D) where I was unable to rotate / edit them. However F-Spot has some nice features such as a very convenient sharpen tool. All in all, such as Picasa, F-Spot is a tool geared toward the entry level of the market. Among the most noticeable lacks are color management, 16bits raw, tagging hierarchy...

Continue reading...

Thursday, October 16 2008

A look into: Google's Picasa

Not much to say on the picture manager side, as Picasa 2.7.0 does not support picture tagging. Structure is based on folders. Not very exciting and I should say that I hardly see how it can manage my 6 years catalog of thousands of pictures (let alone finding something).

I've tested as well the raw support and to my surprise raw are very well supported. The derawing goes very fast (I have a 4 cores processor). Most of the editing is basic and simple and most importantly the results looks very good. To get a similar result, I would have spent twice as much time on Digikam my reference tool.

On the other hand, it lacks the granularity control that would have allowed a Digikam or professional tools such as Photoshop (that I use on a daily basis at work). And as such if the results will fit for most needs, it is clearly one step behind when you want to get excellent results (for an A3 printing for instance).

All in all, a good tool, but mostly oriented toward the entry level of the market (no rant here). Its features and ease of use would probably fit most of the needs (if not all) of a casual user.

Tuesday, October 14 2008

Linux Picture Manager: administrative note

I'm currently assessing a list of software that would fit in my small contest and feature comparison.

The test will be performed on a 1gb worth of pictures with both jpegs and raws. The absolute minimum for the software will be:

  • be able to process / support raw pictures
  • support picture tagging (+ storage of those tags within the pictures when applicable).

This minimalistic list prompts a enormous list of software to be considered. I will review only the one I think have the most mindshare (at least to me), however, anyone is welcome to suggest some more.

One last word about potential bias. I'm using a Gentoo + KDE 4.1 environment and I have been using Digikam for some time now (probably up to 3 years). As a worker in the software industry however, I am used to OS / app switching all the time and this will hopefully reduced the bias. Besides, I will try to be as factual as possible, and as such expose myself to critics (so feel free to express your point if you disagree).

But enough of that. It's time for me to start assessing some apps.

Stay tuned.